WHY THE CHINESE ATTACKED WITH CLUBS?
WHY THE CHINESE ATTACKED WITH CLUBS?
I had a number of questions thrown at me today which was essentially variations of, "Why weren't the Indian soldiers armed during the patrol?"
Well, in 1996, India and China signed an LAC treaty through which agreeing that "neither side shall use its military capability" against the other along their disputed border. Thus, it essentially means, 'No Military Weapons' to be used. Even if soldiers are carrying weapons, they are to be slung behind their back, so that it is always in a 'non-threatening' mode.
Thus, in all such 'confrontations', procedures have been set that weapons will not be unleashed. The soldiers are to unfurl banners stating 'You are in our territory. Please return'. Maintain a safe distance from each other. After the acknowledgement, turn back and leave. Well, that is the official code of conduct.
However, some patrols have still tried to go forth and complete their mission. This generally translates to chesting out each other or creating a human chain to not allow the other side to pass.
There have been instances of fisticuff and stone-pelting. Especially at Pangong lake. Thus soldiers have started carrying staffs with them (and as we saw some plexiglass shields as well).
The Chinese, this time, has decided to up the ante and have brought along crowbars and studded clubs. Time for us to revert back in history to bring some more weight to a party? I can presume that new training will incorporate weaponised street fighting now.
Comments
Post a Comment